Home > Community > Blogs > Arthur Frommer Online
Frommers.com Frommers.com
Arthur Frommer Online
 
Comments, opinion and advice from the founder of Frommer's Travel Guides
Starting in May of 2010, Half of the Itineraries of "Oasis of the Seas" Become Cruises to Nowhere
You have only to read the actual schedules of the new, 220,000-ton, 6,000-passenger Oasis of the Seas to understand the revolutionary nature of the changes it will bring about. I invite you to scan such cruise websites as VacationsToGo.com (www.vacationstogo.com) to learn how little contact the giant vessel will have either with ports of the Caribbean or of Mexico. That site, and others like it, actually list the stops that it will make -- or not make.

On weekly, seven-night sailings, the mammoth ship leaves each Saturday afternoon from Ft. Lauderdale, and heads south on its first night, then sailing for six more days and nights. Every week, on all itineraries, it spends three of those six days simply at sea, stopping nowhere. And then, on an itinerary it follows every other week starting in May, it devotes the fourth of those six days to a stop at the "private island" (actually a "private beach") of Labadee on the coast of Haiti. Labadee, as you may have experienced on one of your own cruises, is a totally isolated stretch of sand fenced in by barbed wire and guards from Haiti and Haitians.

Thus, on the 4th day, as on three other days, your only company and contact are the 6,000 other souls who have accompanied you on Oasis of the Seas.

But wait; hope spring eternal! On the 5th of your six days on board the ship, it stops at something called the Costa Maya. And if you're like me, you mistakenly associate the Costa Maya with the Maya Riviera -- the latter enjoying real Mexican towns and real Mexicans.

But your stop is not on the Maya Riviera, but on the largely deserted coastline well south (by 100 miles) of the Maya Riviera, a stretch of land just above Belize where commercial interests have built a tourist town ("Costa Maya") deliberately and exclusively designed and maintained for cruise passengers. In the words of the popular website Cruise Critic (www.cruisecritic.com) some time ago, it's "what you'd expect if, say, Disney World decided to create its own private island in Mexico…[a] faux village." Indeed, the privately-owned Costa Maya is located a fair distance from the only real Mexican village hereabouts, which had a population of 200 people prior to the construction of the bars, restaurants, and shops that make up Costa Maya.

And don't worry that you're in a foreign country.  Another travel journalist (USA Today, March 27, 2009) has written that Costa Maya is entirely safe since it's largely removed from the realities of Mexico (except for the cruise-serving workers in it). "It's very clean. Very secure," says the port's head of marketing César Lizarraga… "You don't see them, but there are surveillance cameras everywhere."

And needless to say, there are merchants aplenty to rent you beach chairs, zip line rides (three of them), wave runners, and short excursions to some very secondary Mayan ruins.

In other words, your fifth day on Oasis of the Seas is at what is, essentially, another private beach maintained solely for tourists. You have now spent five of your six days afloat solely in the company of your 6,000 fellow passengers.

Finally there's a short day in Cozumel, the only real port stop in an entire one-week cruise, and Cozumel has -- as you've read before on this blog -- many detractors. I consider it the world's dullest port visit.

So there you have it: a ship so humongous that it really can't go into most of the world's ports, a place designed for people who aren't attracted by the wonders of international travel. In a recent interview, I used the words "a dumbing down of the travel experience" to characterize Oasis of the Seas. I was being generous.

[To confirm my analysis of Oasis of the Seas' alternate-week itinerary, look up the stops it makes on the departures of May 1, 15 and 29, June 12 and 26, July 10 and 24, August 7 and 21, September 4 and 18, and so on and on].
Tags: cruise
Email this post
User Image
ladewig wrote:
While I don't have any strong desire to sail on Oasis of the Seas due to the huge number of passengers onboard, I think you're being overly harsh. I love to travel and learn about new cultures, but sometimes I just want to get away and relax. I love sea days on cruises because those are the days I can kick back, relax, and get away from the stress of daily life. Is that so bad? Would it be so difficult for you to pull back on the disdain you hold for this kind of cruise and the people who enjoy that experience. Perhaps acknowledge that this isn't the kind of experience you look for when you travel, but that for others it might be just what they are looking for?
11/3/2009 7:25 AM EST
User Image
Parrot Mom wrote:
WOW.. an honest report of the Oasis....the floating resort...perfect for people who just want to cruise and not interact with "locals" who do not speak english..Thank you for not fawning over this humongous monstrosity that is entering the cruise industry...The NCL Epic maybe the next one...
11/3/2009 7:27 AM EST
User Image
Channah wrote:
I prefer the smaller ship I went on (carries 900 passengers) that can go in and out of smaller ports along the way.
11/3/2009 7:57 AM EST
User Image
Dee1010 wrote:
I had a sneaking suspicion that the Oasis was going to be this way. There comes a time when "bigger" just isn't "better".
11/3/2009 9:49 AM EST
User Image
catlady29 wrote:
This is the perfect ship for people who don't want any interactions with the rest of the world so that they can keep their illusions about the greatness of the USA and the mediocrity of everyone else. Unfortunately, RCL probably will be able to fill the ship with these cretins time after time. I hate this explosion of huge ships - cruising for the lowest common denominator has ruined it for travelers who want a genuine experience but can't afford the small ships. I miss Renaissance Cruises so much!
11/3/2009 9:51 AM EST
User Image
xyz011430 wrote:
rip off--but if people fall for it.
11/3/2009 10:30 AM EST
User Image
Guest capacity is 5,400 based on double occupancy, not 6,000. Just trying to be helpful.

The bottom line is that everyone has different interests and tastes and the most important thing is to make that match accordingly. In the case of a mega ship like the Oasis, it is the ship itself that is the destination. There are people that love that and there are people that don't. It can also be a mood thing. Sometimes I want a port intensive cruise where I run around exploring all different destinations and sometimes I just want to relax and look for itineraries with a lot of days at sea or ports that are more low key like Eastern Canada.

catlady29, I have news to put a smile on your face. That type of cruise that you are missing is out there. I just came back from one a month ago and it was brilliant ;-).
11/3/2009 10:31 AM EST
User Image
Barb Nahoumi wrote:
These floating cities are so unnecessary. Cruiselines shoul build a few mid-sized ships, that can fit into smaller ports without having to tender.

I enjoyed my cruises on the NCL Majesty. It was a smaller cozy ship, and I knew where everything was.

Barb
11/3/2009 10:46 AM EST
User Image
Gypsy Heart wrote:
Thank you for sharing a candid opinion about this new vessel. I have been employed with a major cruise line. I realize the larger ships can offer greater amenities etc. but I personally prefer the intimacy of the smaller vessels and the ability they have to enter various smaller ports. In the past you personally recommended a particular small (1, perhaps 2 ships) cruise organization which appeared to have quite spacious passenger state rooms and offered wonderful customer service. I've forgotten the name of the company and wondered if you'd be kind enough to share it again . . ?
11/3/2009 11:01 AM EST
User Image
bdapilot wrote:
The true reason for making ships larger with more gimmicks onboard is to maximize the revenues for the company. When you are ashore, wherever, they make less money.
Mind you large ships are attractive to some passengers, even just to see what is on offer once. I may cruise on her once, but I enjoy the destinations too.
11/3/2009 12:22 PM EST
1 2 >> Last
 
Home > Community > Blogs > Arthur Frommer Online