Frommers.com Frommers.com
Community Blogs Behind the Guides
Comments, opinion and advice from the founder of Frommer's Travel Guides
Opposition Seems to be Building to the TSA's Proposed Relaxation of Its Security Rules to Permit Pocket Knives to be Carried Aboard Airplanes
Both the union of flight attendants, and the union of federal air marshals, seem to be waging a powerful campaign against the TSA's proposed weakening of its security regulations to permit pocket knives to be carried aboard airplanes.  It was recently pointed out by the president of the flight attendants' union that the September 11 hijackers took control of aircraft with box cutters having blades smaller than the pocket knives that the T.S.A. would now permit.  Whether or not those pocket knives could now enable future hijackers to break through the doors of the airplanes' cockits, they could apparently cause severe injury to the attendants and passengers against whom they are used.

I find that argument compelling, and am puzzled as to why the TSA has proposed such revisions to its regulations.  The claim that the new rules would bring us into sync with European regulations seems unconvincing; the Europeans' record of aviation safety--the ease with which they allowed the "shoe-bomber" and the "underwear bomber" onto planes--does not inspire confidence.

I plan to mail my own opposition to the new rules to the TSA, and feel that readers of this blog might want their own views to be known.
Tags: TSA
Email this post
User Image
fse wrote:
The purpose of airport security should be to prevent people from destroying airplanes, resulting in massive casualties. Pocket knives are no longer capable of doing that.

It's true that they can be used to assault bystanders. But why do airplanes warrant special measures to prevent simple assaults? Pocket knives are equally dangerous in restaurants and theaters, but we don't routinely search anyone in those settings.
3/29/2013 12:19 PM EDT
User Image
Peter Knight wrote:
"Pocket knives are equally dangerous in restaurants and theaters, but we don't routinely search anyone in those settings." Yes, but there is no escape room in an airplane.

As far as European security is concerned, they confiscated a nail cutter because it had a nail file on it. Guess what, they were selling a similar nail file from their on-board duty free shop.
3/30/2013 12:51 PM EDT
User Image
fse wrote:
There is no escape room in a subway train, or even a bus speeding down the highway. That doesn't mean we should search their passengers.
3/31/2013 11:12 AM EDT
User Image
P.Weber wrote:
"It was recently pointed out by the president of the flight attendants' union that the September 11 hijackers took control of aircraft with box cutters having blades smaller than the pocket knives that the T.S.A. would now permit."

That is NOT how they took control. They took control because up until that fateful day flight crews were trained, and passengers expected, to acquiesce to hijackers. Prior to 9/11, a passenger jet was not used as a suicide WMD.
4/1/2013 12:07 PM EDT
User Image
EthanWinter wrote:
They shouldn't allowed the passengers to carry this kind of harmful substance with themselves. I completely support the opposition.
http://www.chesstelecom.com/Telephone-Systems
4/4/2013 5:20 AM EDT
User Image
GarryRF wrote:
What is this fascination some Americans have with weapons? You don't need an offensive weapon like a knife on a flight any more than you need an assault rifle to repel some kid who knocked on the wrong door at Halloween.
You don't live in the "Wild West" any more. And you don't belong to a "well regulated Militia" like it says in your Constitutional Rights, so you don't have the right to "Bear Arms". The rest of the World watches with amazement as 30,000 young lives are cut short because some fool demand his rights.
4/6/2013 3:32 PM EDT


Community Blogs