Frommers.com Frommers.com
Community Blogs Behind the Guides
Comments, opinion and advice from the founder of Frommer's Travel Guides
Whether or Not the United States is to Enjoy High-Speed Rail Will Be Decisively Debated Within the Coming Weeks
A great many publications have failed to draw attention to the fact that the President's budget for Fiscal Year 2013 contains the first appropriation of a five-year plan to allocate between $35 and $50 billion for the development of high-speed rail in the United States. At last, our nation would take decisive steps to fund a high-speed rail corridor between Los Angeles and San Francisco, another along the west coast of Florida, one in the state of Michigan, and in other important and heavily populated areas. That kind of economic stimulus would not only create hundreds of thousands of new jobs, but would set us on the path towards becoming a modern, efficient and prosperous nation in the field of transportation.
 
It should be noted, in my view, that this is not a partisan issue. A great many Republicans, including the one Republican cabinet member in the Administration, Secretary of Transportation Ray La Hood, enthusiastically support this national initiative. This week, Ray La Hood is in California, urging that legislators of both parties there stay firm in their insistence on creation of a high-speed rail corridor along the coast of California.  
 
So we are at a turning point.  Are we to remain a horse-and-buggy nation, mired for hours on end in traffic jams, condemned to waste valuable time at crowded airports with planes stacked up in the skies, or are we to become a modern, efficient, economically-prosperous nation of sensible transportation? This, to me, is not a partisan goal, but should be advanced by people of all political persuasions.   
Tags: trains
Email this post
User Image
Donna Cuervo wrote:
While I would love to see lots of high speed rail service in the United States, I don't know if it would reduce the number of airline flights in many cases. I've often wanted to use the Acela service from New York to Boston (which isn't that fast compared to what they have in Europe), but I've been discouraged when I see how much cheaper it would be to fly. The two times I did use it, it had a lot of delays and didn't get me there much faster than the regular regional train.

I've been working on many very early morning flights into JFK from cities such as Rochester, Syracuse and Buffalo. These flights sell well and are packed with people who need to be in Manhattan at the beginning of business hours. With the quick 40 minute flying time this is possible even with the commute in from the airport most likely covered by expense account transportation. These flights are also filled with airport workers who commute right in to jobs at the airport giving people in these areas access to employment they might not otherwise have. These jobs might not be realistic for them if they had to take a train to Manhattan and get to the airport from there.
2/14/2012 6:29 PM EST

Community Blogs